Savoirs en Prisme | 11 Audacity : virtue, value
Florence Dumora, Caroline Julliot, Elisabeth Rothmund
Since Roman days, the sense of audacity has fluctuated between two opposite poles: in its pejorative sense, it has to do with hubris and rashness and is traditionally associated with the ardor and errors of youth; in its positive sense, by contrast, it signifies insight, well-thought-out independence, and the capacity to seize the favorable opportunity to bring about a change in power relations or ideas. When it implies the crossing of a limit which turns out to be insurmountable, it ends in failure and is considered futile, if not ridiculous. Conversely, the actions it generates are considered strokes of genius, brilliant successes when the subversion it initiates is, in retrospect, recognized, legitimized and integrated into a new order it has contributed to establish.
No wonder that, stimulated by a critical mind, audacity should appear as the driving force of Progress: Sapere aude! Horace’s formula, taken up by Kant as the motto of Enlightenment, refers to the courage to break with former allegiances in order to achieve autonomy. For audacity should not be confused with mere provocation: it does not oppose the pre-existing frameworks in a spirit of contradiction but it destroys in order to build. Audacity is visionary: it breaks free from the yokes of the past in order to lay the foundations of the future. Thus, it stands out as a privileged value in a world in love with innovation and energy — and perhaps all the more waved around in times of crisis as the prevailing feeling of decadence vies with the hope for a renewal. “Audacity, always audacity!”, Danton proclaimed.
We have lost count of the references to audacity and the calls for it in the most diverse fields of experience: in politics, science, military strategy, technology, philosophy, art… To-day audacity appears as a “rising value” claimed by a great variety of trends and circles. As the highest expression of personal will, audacity, the exceptional quality of the hero, seems to have become, in the era of triumphant individualism, the most widely shared thing in the world… to the point of serving as an alibi for conformism.
– Renewal: by its spiritual and intellectual nature, audacity appears as the capacity to elaborate any conceptual object by going off the beaten track, by offering a proposal or a solution.
– The issues of representation: can we stage characters, attitudes or audacious ideas without the support of the authorities – be they political, moral or social?
– Audacity in art: hasn’t audacity in terms of form become a main priority for the artist, in other words, a new conformism?
– Discourse and strategy: how does the Establishment relate to the notion of audacity?Proposals for articles (limited to 15 lines) should indicate the axis (or axes) to which they are related and be accompanied by a short biographical note mentioning institutional affiliation and email address. They are to be sent jointly to the three following addresses before December 15th, 2018:- Florence.firstname.lastname@example.org
– Elisabeth.email@example.comAccepted languages : French, Spanish, English
Important information and dates for the full paper submission :
– Maximum length 50. 000 characters (notes, spaces and bibliography included)
– Notification of the scientific committee: January 15th 2019
– Submission of the full paper: May 15th 2019
– Notification of anonymous peer evaluation: September 2019
– The revised papers are to be sent before November 15th 2019
– Publication in number 11 of the online journal Savoirs en Prisme expected by December 2019 / January 2020.
Page formatting norms available on :
https ://savoirsenprisme.com/note-aux-auteurs/ (https://savoirsenprisme.com/note-aux-auteurs/)
Website of Savoirs en prisme : https://savoirsenprisme.com/ (https://savoirsenprisme.com/)
Florence Dumora (Université de Reims), Caroline Julliot (Université du Mans), Elisabeth Rothmund (Université de Créteil)